Jobs a-plenty but not if Gillard could help itBY BENJAMIN ONG | FRIDAY, 15 MAR 2013 9:35AMThe surge in employment was unequivocal with all measures on the up and up.
|
Editor's Choice
ASIC hits back at parliament: 'Simply not realistic'
|The financial regulator has hit back at suggestions it isn't doing enough to deal with community complaints.
The risks and opportunities in advice: SIAA
|This year's Stockbrokers and Investment Advisers Association (SIAA) Conference will take a deep dive into how major financial advice reforms will impact superannuation funds and how they are preparing to help Australians particularly retirees access advice.
AMP Advice partners with BlackRock and Lonsec
|Through the partnership, AMP Advice will introduce a new category of tailored managed portfolio solutions.
Succession planning troubles family offices: J.P. Morgan
|Global family offices remain deeply concerned about how to prepare the next generation to inherit a vast fortune as almost 30% do not have a structured approach to help them, a new study from J.P. Morgan reveals.
Further Reading
Sponsored by | Where do advisers invest their time?The stage 3 tax cuts have sparked discussions on bracket creep. Implementing a tax-effective investment strategy is crucial now more than ever. |
Sponsored by | Quality and Yield. A Powerful combination.With central bank rates seemingly peaked, investors are not awaiting yield increases. We're bucking the trend with investment rates at decadal highs |
Sponsored by | Why it could be a good time to be a growth contrarianGrowth-style companies are in vogue, but you may need to think outside the box to ensure you don't overpay. |
Products
Featured Profile
Fiona Mann
HEAD OF LISTED EQUITIES AND ESG
BRIGHTER SUPER
BRIGHTER SUPER
Brighter Super head of listed equities and ESG Fiona Mann was shaped by a childhood steeped in military-like discipline and global nomadism. Andrew McKean writes.
Everyone should completely ignore the figures from the ABS, they have absolutely no credibility. Only Gillard and this government will use them because they are fudged and make the government look good. It is a cruel hoax on those searching for work. As a former economist I will go with the figures from the Roy Morgan Research Centre which comes up with 10.9% unemployment and 8.9% underemployment. So nearly 20% in total for unemployment and underemployment.
The way they do their polling and research is far more realistic and correct methodology which they have used consistently since 1949.
An appalling right wing article typical of the negative element who'll praise nothing good that the govenment has done.